Tuesday, March 21, 2017

So Much For Being Favored By God.

Chapter Nine  

Being a Jew, I was introduced at an early age, in Hebrew  Kindergarten, to the God of  Genesis.

 From the very beginning, He seemed rather fickle. It's as if He doesn't know what He's doing. He creates Man and it would appear as if without Man, Creation has no reason To Be. It all begins to function only after God makes man out of dust, discovers he is lonely and  puts him to sleep. God pulls a rib out of him and wraps it in flesh and blood, making a woman. She shortly gets him and herself  and all of mankind  into grave irrevocable trouble, from then on out. God makes a Man that seems able to surprise Him with disobedience. God is punishing. God doesn't like competition. God makes man and seems to lose control over him. Doesn't He know what He is doing?

And then things just get wilder and more incomprehensible.

   There is only one man and one woman as his companion, and they have two sons and one kills the other. Making things worse, the one killed is the one it says was favored by God, making his brother so jealous over this favoritism that he slew his own flesh and blood in a jealous rage.

 So much for being favored by God.

Is  this kind of man, the best God could create? Sinning, competitive, jealous, murderous? Unpredictable? Capable of becoming like God Himself and threatening God's hegemony over nature, His supremacy? And what kind of God would be afraid of his own creation? Isn't God supposed to be in command? Isn't He defined as The One in command?

Yes, I was full of questions about my Kindergarten Hebrew School God. Then they taught me the story of the Deluge and God obviously had regrets, made mistakes. He created  a man that became something he regretted having made, full of evil thoughts all day long. He decides to kill everyone and not only the men, women and children, why all the animals too! Everything alive on the ground, all to be drowned.

No one told me The Bible doesn't really mean it. That it didn't really happen that way, that these are just stories with lessons to be learned, not historical facts. Can you believe that? Grown up people, teachers, my father the Rabbi, everyone acted like they believed these stories were a description of actual events. Who was I to say that it simply made no sense? From the very beginning, to me, none of it made any sense! I was told, "You will understand when you get older!" "Don't ask so many questions!"

No one taught me what a metaphor is. My father, God Rest His Soul, was a Rabbi! Yet he couldn't answer my questions himself.

I was constantly thinking to myself,  what kind of God is This that I am supposed to believe in? But I believed, anyway.

For a while. Things got no better.

It certainly didn't seem like this God of The Jews cared whether I live or die. He seemed distant, unapproachable, frightening. He hid in a fire and Moses was afraid of Him. He got angry at Moses for just asking questions.

As a child I had fears of dying, getting an incurable disease, a growth in my brain. I would dream I was falling down tunnels of flame, falling forever. God didn't really care, it seemed, based on everything I was taught and my own experiences, too. 

He is almost always angry. Uncompromising. Unsatisfied with His Own Creations. He has regrets, He is Jealous. He redeems the Children of Israel from bondage in Egypt and then wants to destroy them. He keeps killing them, with fire and snakes. He promises  them through Moses a Land of Milk and Honey and instead kills a whole generation in the desert, realizing their worst fears about what He would do to them.  He creates a nation and then keeps threatening to destroy it. It appears like they keep disappointing Him, as if He is surprised by them. Isn't God supposed to know the future?  Doesn't He tell Abraham the future of his seed, that they would go down to Egypt, be enslaved, then freed? So, why is  He so disappointed at His own doing? He punishes His own Creation for its doing what He makes it do! It makes less and less sense.

And at the same time, He has all these powers! He showers the world with water till every one dies. He showers fire and brimstone on two cities full of sinners and kills everyone. He turns a woman into salt just for turning around and looking at what she had to leave behind. He saves Lot  and then his daughters get him drunk and have sex with him. Oh, I forgot.

He saves Noah and his family, but Noah is a drunkard and his own son not only commits sodomy on him, it is said he castrated him too. No, they didn't tell me this in Kindergarten, I heard this at a Jewish Yeshiva my father sent me to when I was 12.

And what about Reuben who slept with his father's wife and got away with it?

But still I believed.

And the contradictions!  The people want a King. God starts by making a good man, the best among them  King, and then completely destroys him and his sons. Even his heir, a good man by all counts, Jonathan, is killed in a losing battle and his body is hung, together with his father's and brothers, on the walls of their enemies' city. Samuel, the most consensual Hebrew Prophet of them all, Tells Saul that God has no regrets and then God tells Saul He regrets making Saul King.

Samuel tells Saul that The Eternal One of Israel doesn't lie, but it seems one has to live  forever to understand why.

So. I learned that The Jews say, the Bible needs to be interpreted to be understood. But even the interpretations need to be interpreted, because every generation just understands less and less. The religion gets ever more confusing, contradictory and full of  insoluble paradox. It is mystery and only mystics have a clue after years of ascetic living and self deprivation and then they write books which no one understands either, not in a way they can explain to me simply, what is going on!

I haven't   shared yet how my childhood  was a series of  ever more inexplicable crises. Confusions of Biblical proportions!  Non stop chaos. Nothing was permanent. Divorce and betrayal and abandonment and a whoring mother and an emotionally distant father who was completely self involved and knew everything but told me almost nothing that made any  sense. (There were a few things he told me that I remember as being very precious and wise.  Short anecdotes with lessons I only understood fully much later in life. But he didn't like my personality and told me as much.) 

Boy, The Jews sure have an incomprehensible and out of reach God, who seems just like my father.  So I loved my father deeply and loyally and loved God too. Don't ask me how, I just did. But He was so, so distant. So out of touch. Hebrew prayers meant nothing to me. I read them without comprehension like most every one else. It was if the prayer leader  read the first lines and the last lines and everyone mumbled incomprehensibly everything in between.

So there is this God who makes things and then regrets making them. This God who is the only one there is, too. You have no one else to turn to, no higher authority to make complaints. Everything in His creation seems out of control. Terribly cruel and full of sudden tragedy and mass death. First I read of The Holocaust, but my mind got all tangled up in knots. Then I read of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thought about a man sitting on the toilet, doing his business, and suddenly being blown into a cloud of dust. Out of no where, one moment you are there, telling your self some kind of story about your own life and in the next moment, there is no lesson learned because you are just stains on the rubble  of your disintegrated home.

Back to the Holocaust. Here you are telling yourself you are a Jew, a member of God's chosen people and you find pride and distinguished dignity in your cultural identity. And then you are being evicted from your home, having your beard and sidelocks sheared off with scissors in front of a mocking crowd,  and then you are scorned for believing everything you do about your God and your place in His plan for all of humanity, sent off to slave camps and those who can't work are slaughtered more brutally than cattle. Is this God's reward for preserving His Book, the very same book that makes Him look so ferociously indignant all the time because of how you behave?

Look at these Jews! God's chosen people? Chosen for what? They go to their deaths refusing to deny the very same God who promised them they will be slaughtered in every way imaginable for refusing to obey Him. He tells them through His Prophets that mothers will eat their own children in  desperate hunger during the sieges of their future enemies and then terrible stories of siege  are told. In one a woman  complains to the king that she and a neighbor had eaten her baby the night before and now her previous dinner partner was hiding her own baby boy from being cooked in their mutual cooking pot!

Throughout history there are Jews that hold on to this precious Hebrew Bible, and refuse to deny its laws and precepts at the cost of not only their livelihoods, homes, but at times their very lives and the lives of their loved ones, culminating in the horrific actuality of The Holocaust, which ended just over 11 years before I was born.

This God of The Jews is problematic, to say the least. I was told God actually makes sense. Be Good and see good. You are rewarded or punished based on your actions. God is Just. I was also told there is no understanding God's justice. The wicked thrive and the righteous suffer miserably, like Job.
Have faith! Believe!

I mean even the Children of Israel were shown miracles by Moses so they could believe in Him. But now it seems God doesn't really perform miracles, despite all the miracles in Egypt, culminating in God's ability to kill just like that. He stops the heartbeat of all the first born in Egypt in a single night. The cries and the wailing are heard all across the land. He makes pillars of fire and smoke. He splits the ocean with a wind till the ground is dry and then covers up Israel's   enemies with the waters of the sea, released from his hold on them. All of Egypt is drowned and the bodies are dead on the edge of the beach.

The Children of Israel thirst and He turns stone into water. And when they demand meat He gives it to them and then kills them while the meat is still between their teethe and before they can swallow it.

He opens up the earth as if it has a mouth that swallows alive whole families for rebelling against Moses by their saying, " God talks to us, too!"

When the people express fear that they will not be able to conquer the land God has promised them, fear they will die in the dessert, He says "That is exactly what will happen to you, what you fear will become real, you will all die in the desert for not trusting Me."

Moses  begs to live a little longer, to see the Promised Land of Milk and Honey  himself, and  God tells him to shut up and stop begging. He shows Moses what he will never experience in the flesh and then kills him and buries him some place no one will ever find.

Honestly, no wonder there are so few Jews in the world after all these thousands of years they have been reproducing. It is amazing they all didn't become Christians and buy into this new always Benevolent God, who has His Only Begotten son tortured and then slaughtered horrifically as proof of His love for humanity. All one has to do is believe that God has One Son,  and that Son is God in The Flesh and He Comes To Redeem Man from Sin by dying for everyone but then gets his life back for all eternity and........No, Christianity doesn't have a better narrative than The Jews, I am afraid. But still it would have been expedient to exchange one outlandish ridiculous narrative for another. One could have an easier life without all these rules and regulations that make it ever more difficult to have fun. Oh, there  are many Jews down the ages that are seduced by the expediency of conversion and who appear to adopt Christian and then Muslim narratives. Never the less,  a hardcore nation of multi colored individuals living in coalescent  communities in every civilization of the world, over the course of History, maintain their Jewish identity. How? Why?

It makes no sense. But I believed anyway.

Recently, I have come to understand part of the mystery of the phenomena of The Jews. When a narrative is deemed of Divine origin, no matter how absurd  and outrageous, it has a high value in the mind  as a determining factor in behavior.  The idea of Divinity does this. The Divine, whether one god or many, has the power to shape our existence. Therefore knowledge of the nature of the Divine is the most valuable in the mind. Divine stories in all cultures are revered and were preserved before writing, by word of mouth. This makes sense. If there are divine powers that determine the course of our life and to what degree our needs are met or not, knowledge of these powers and how to appease them and supplicate their intervention on our behalf, is the most important knowledge there is and that makes perfect sense. If a people have a narrative that goes back to the beginning of time and explains how they came to be in the circumstances they are in when they hear the narrative, and then the narrative goes on to describe the future of this people and by so doing, gives them meaning and value and significance greater than any to be achieved by abandoning this narrative, they won't abandon it, no matter what. Even a meaningful death is more valuable than an incomprehensible chaotic life, as regards the priorities of the mind. So not only The Jews coalesce around their divine narrative and hold on to it despite whatever the consequences of doing so, so do the Christians and The Muslims and Hindus and Buddhists and people of any faith in a message that they believe comes from whatever be their idea of Heaven as Master of Earth.

    What is unique about the Jews is the actual historical STORY that  is the consequence of their clinging to some kind of Divine Narrative that started even before they went down to Egypt, and could only have been told by word of mouth. That narrative of The God of Abraham, The God of Isaac, and The God of Jacob. This is the narrative that started  with the beginning of the world and explained why the Jews found themselves in Egypt as slaves. They didn't have yet the written Hebrew Bible with the Books of Moses condemning them as a stiff necked people. The just had a story about some God who promised their ancestors a home in a land called Canaan as a free people, and they believed some day a messiah would come and realize that divine promise. At least that is what it says in The Books of Moses.

What is unique about the Jews is that once they had a divine narrative, it kept growing and became ever more sophisticated as did their culture and their history. Their Torah became an ever dynamic self fulfilling prophecy that just got more and more complex in its interpretations as they survived one civilization after another. The mental secretions of Jews trying to interpret the Books of Moses and Justify the God they believed in became a powerful social glue that held them together intellectually and in the spirit, despite vast distances between their communities  and great differences of social context, as they found themselves dispersed in all the different cultures of the civilizations they maintained their identity in. Other peoples hold on to their Divine Narratives tenaciously too. But The Jew's narrative evolved and grew in quantity of holy texts, the duration of the Divine Narrative to which was added events as their destiny twisted and turned,  and the complexity of their contradicting doctrines and dogmas. They developed the Kabbalah which became the foundation of  Gentile mystics attempts to decipher the meaning of Divine signs and symbols throughout the Orient and Western civilization.

   All this doesn't change the fact that at Face value, The God of The Jews who spoke to Moses "Face to Face", is a paradoxical conglomerate of contradictions, a wild storm of a God, whose disregard for the life of mankind is demonstrated in the fact of death itself. And death comes after what seems to be  inexplicable  sequences of chaotic events, where one man, a cruel despot, gets rich and has many wives and countless offspring, finally dying peacefully in a ripe old age with his loving family around him, and another who strove all his life to be virtuous, dies young anyway like an abandoned impoverished dog in the street, haphazardly run over by a horse and carriage.  Both such narratives happen and God is the Author of All narratives, The Jews tell themselves and the world.

And the narrative of the Jews itself is just a wild story of a people who cling blindly to a narrative out of the hubris of believing they are God's chosen and special among the nations. Even though the composers of the narrative, the Prophets and the Scribes, write of the Jews of their own generations, that they are for the most part, a heartless disobedient nation of ingrates, deserving of every illness in the book of curses and those not in the book as well! Moses says explicitly that every disease of the mind or body or the heart that can come to man The Jews will deserve and suffer from, for their disobedience ind ungrateful natures.

The Jews don't like to confront the simplicity and outright literal meanings of these passages, for obvious reasons.

Now one might go so far as to say, Here and Now, in today's world,  The Jews have begun to manifest the miraculous divine nature of their uniqueness in that they are a free people in their own hard won land once again.

Certainly as an historical event, The Jews return to Israel as an independent nation and the revival of Hebrew culture over the course of the last 150 years, is an utterly anomalous and unprecedented event in human history, enough so to cause millions of Christians to find in these events the affirmation of their own prophetic narrative which includes a second coming of their Messiah to complete the work of the first, who obviously left behind a world with a lot of imperfection and falling far short of the visions of the Hebrew Prophets they claim laid the prophetic foundation for the coming of their Messiah God, Jesus Christ. These Hebrew Prophets spoke of an End of Days when there would be world peace, but the history of mankind since the death of and purported resurrection of  Jesus Christ has been anything but peaceful. This to no small extant due to Christians imposing their belief on heathens, too.

The vast majority of the Jews themselves don't seem to believe that the Creation of The Secular State of Israel as a national home for the Jews, to solve the problems of antisemitism, is a Divine Manifestation.  Just as they dislike the idea that the Holocaust was a Divine Manifestation. They understandably can't comprehend how a million Jewish children deserved to die prematurely of  divinely designed illnesses and starvation or to be tossed alive into mass graves with their murdered parents. Secular Jews deny the Jew's narrative in The Hebrew Bible is of a Divine source to begin with. Many don't believe in a God and those that do, not necessarily the God of Israel. Many religious Jews don't see the birth of Israel as anything different than the previous chaotic historical events they have survived as a nation and Israel is likely to disappear as mysteriously and insignificantly as it came to be. Only the coming of their Messiah can resolve the paradoxical and contradictory ball of confusion which is their own history and their dogma and doctrines and holy books. They believe that all of this world that surrounds them is best ignored for the noise it is, as anything that distracts from the study of the interpretations of the  incomprehensible teachings of The Hebrew Prophets is to be ignored and remain unacknowledged as anything but a test of their blind faith. To be distracted from the study of the Talmud is to sin. Very simple.

All of this is part of the context in which my Faith in My God of Art developed.  There is also the sequence of personal events that led me to finally abandon the God of Israel and The God of my Fathers in search for another explanation for this wild confusion of a universe, some as yet unknown to me narrative of circumstance and consequence that makes more sense.

Now I believed in The God of Israel for no other reason than people believe anything that aligns them with something more powerful and of longer duration than themselves. My father told me no more than this. "You are a Jew. Jews Believe In One God, The God of Israel, and Israel is The Nation of The Jews. You Believe This No Matter What!" This belief  aligned with those Jews who believe the same and "the Jews are a special, powerful nation of long duration", thus giving my own life meaning and value and historical significance.  Who doesn't want that? For this reason people are patriots of whatever notion of a nation they belong to.  When people value humanity more than nations they  see themselves as citizens of the world and achieve what they believe to be greater significance and value by having their own belief, like every one else. Some people align themselves with groups for other reasons than historical significance, such as soccer fans. They are in it for the dopamine rush of social cohesion, which is perhaps merely a more intense version of the same thing.

This aligning belief with a group is a very cohesive element in one's mind and not soon abandoned. Negating such a belief in one's self has potentially severe consequences and only occurs when a renewed assessment of one's beliefs leads to the prediction that continued allegiance to an old idea will lead to greater disintegration and disillusion than adopting a new belief or at least initiating a search for one.  People do leave old alliances and embark on journeys of self discovery in the hope of finding more meaning and value in new allegiances. This is both the biblical story of Abraham and Rahav The  Prostitute. Abraham left his father's land and his nation with it's belief in idols and many gods and Rahav betrayed her nation of idol worshipers to join a greater  and more powerful nation with a destiny she chose to be part of.

My own faith in God weathered some very chaotic and confusing experiences starting from the day I was born. My mother was my father's fourth wife. They met at a horse race track. My father was a 37 year old Rabbi and my mother was a 17 year old student in high school. What either were doing at a horse race track other than the obvious I couldn't say. My mother once told me that her family at the time was poor and my father appeared to be a relatively well to do, elegantly dressed and charismatic "older" man who could extricate her from a dead end life situation. My father said that he fell very much in love with his fourth wife. At any rate they married.

I can't find anything of substance about my mother on the internet. She died recently but that was of little significance to me as I grew up without her and had made peace with her decease in my life many years prior to her death.

About my father there are a number of articles. This sums them up.
My Father's Legacy

The article doesn't mention my mother and father's marriage. I was told I was conceived while my parents were on vacation in Miami Florida. Between then and my first conscious memories, a lot happened.  My father left his calling as a Rabbi and determined to make more money and buy my mother beautiful things, he learned how to be a stock broker. He was very successful.  My first memories all have to do with moving into ever bigger houses. I distinctly remember my father coming into the house and declaring he is worth over 2 million dollars, must have been back in 1960 or so. He bought my mother a convertible Cadillac she promptly crashed. We had a live in maid. The only memory I have of my father and me together is our going to Synagogue on the High Holidays. I am dressed in a suit with short pants and feel uncomfortable in my clothes. My father makes me feel rushed as he holds my hand and leads the way to prayers. My mother was distant and came and left my mind in a blur. I don't recall any affection. I am sure she didn't breast feed us, at that time. She didn't have a job either. The live in maid took care of  my older sister and myself and then my mother had my brother Daniel in 1959 and my youngest sister then, Deborah was born in 1961. I remember feeling confused as I kept having to cope with new environments.

   I vaguely remember my mother teaching me to read. I remember once getting onto bed with her as she was watching television. I remember her making me  a lettuce and tomato sandwich with mayonnaise on toast. It was very good but I don't recall her ever making it for me again. I remember her giving me a silky nightgown of hers to go to sleep with when we moved into a new house, as I had recurrent  nightmares. I didn't understand why it was supposed to help. My father was a distant mystery.

   I was sent to a Hebrew Kindergarten where I heard my first confusing Bible Stories. Once my mother left me off but the school was closed, it was some holiday she wasn't aware of. She drove away and I was collected by a teacher who happened by and took me to her home. She called my mother who came and picked me up, unapologetic. There was always something very superficial about her communications to me. I felt brushed off, all the time.

My father got in trouble with the securities and exchange commission. They annulled his license. He still had a lot of money and we moved to Phoenix, Arizona. He had a house built which was yet incomplete and the night we arrived, the hotel we were staying at burnt down. I distinctly remember him carrying me out of the smoke engulfed room, crying later because some stranger picked me up and brought me to his room, I thought every one was dead but me. I saw the flames from the window seem to lick the sky, they were so high. I was told my mother passed out. My father coughed out smoke for days, weeks. I had recurrent nightmares of falling down tunnels of flame for months afterward.

My father, for some reason, decides to change our name from Rabinowitz to Robbins. This of course changes the Hebrew Value of my name in Gematria, aligning it with Bible Code which has the values of my Hebrew name in verses concerned with the nature and coming of The Messiah.

The Gematria Code in The Hebrew Bible That Discloses The Identity of The Messiah

First grade, secular school, the teachers think I am a genius and I am put into a special class where I am completely out of touch with what is going on. My mother buys me a record player as a reward. I am confused at school. Nothing makes any sense.  I get therapy sessions for a speech defect, I can't pronounce the letter L.  My neck is twisted, somehow, my mother hangs me for long minutes from some contraction which connects to the door. My father is away, looking for a business in Israel.

My mother becomes even more distant. I am full of  relentless curiosity and go through her drawers. I find a massage vibrator  and I can't say why, I hid it underneath the porch with some dollar coins I found too. She is perplexed more than angry. She tells me she will take us all to the amusement park but she leaves me behind. I am bitterly disappointed. Her only excuse was , "I couldn't find you and it was getting late."

 I see a movie with my half sister Sharon and I cry when Hercules throws a large stone wheel on his enemies and their blood flows down their crushed bodies.  We had a swimming pool behind the house and I charge kids from the neighborhood for a swim. Once I am at some neighbor's house and three kids my age try to force me to bend down to a picture of Jesus, I don't know how they knew I am a Jew. They didn't succeed. I walk away feeling strong and lonely.

I go with my half sister Sharon to the movie "West Side Story" and want to love some girl some day the way Tony loves Maria. When they sing the song 'There's a place for us." I think it was all worth it  even though Tony dies. Sharon cries and I smile.

Mt father is away for a long time. I see my mother reading the book "Sex and the Single Woman" in a bathing suit by the swimming pool and feel disturbed but I can't say why. She shows me a dying puppy in the shed behind the house and tells me she meant it as a birthday present but it has a disease. I don't recall ever seeing it again.

 I pour colorful cleaning or testing chemicals into the pool as an experiment. It needs to be drained and refilled.

My mother is bathing in the afternoon and calls me to the bathroom. I am six years old. I can see her nakedness and feel  aghast. She asks me to bring her the towel. I do so, a brown towel. I give it to her and run away as fast as I can.

Little  girls are inviting me to look at their private parts. I don't know why. I am ashamed to look, but do so through my fingers. They giggle at me. This happens a lot. I want to tell my mother about it, what the neighbor's daughters ask  me to do in the card board houses I would make in the back yard, but I don't.

There is a Playboy Magazine I find in the house. I am fascinated. There is a picture of a naked woman with curly dark hair, leaning backwards against a man's chest in the shower. She is smiling at me from the picture. I can't stop looking at it. It is engraved in my mind and comes back to me frequently, whenever I see a naked woman in the shower, in a movie or in my own life. Finally, when I am 40 years old, I find myself in Paris with the love of my life, a sweet girl of 25 with black curls. We are in the shower and she leans against me, just as the girl did in the picture and the picture comes into my mind out of no where, like an explosion. I think, "This was meant to be!" It surely was.

Once the police come to investigate a vandalism of an empty house. Children had poured paint all over the walls. It had been my doing with a couple of other kids I had lead on an excursion. My mother lied blatantly and said I had been sick, I had never left the house. She didn't even ask me about it.

My mother is in bed with another woman. I come into the room and sense something thickly sensual. I feel out of place. I don't understand.

We move into a smaller apartment.  I change schools. My mother is supposed to sell the house and we are meant to join my father in Israel. This happens more than once, the moving into a smaller apartment, the changing of school. One night I wake up and walk into the living room in the middle of the night. I had heard my mother laughing and she sounded like I had never heard her before. When I came into the room, she was sitting on some strangers lap. She looked at me impatiently and got up without a word and walked into her bedroom, The stranger went in after her, after he told me to go to bed, my mother has a headache.

In the morning I tried to talk about this with my sister Suzie but she just told me to shut up. I went to school in a daze and when I came back, my mother was gone. There were some sandwiches cut in neat triangles and a glass of milk, with a note saying she would be back soon.  There was a sharp pencil and a pad of paper. I felt frustrated and confused. I had a painful lump in my throat. I took the pencil and pressed the point against my skin until the tip of the pencil pierced and I felt  a sharp pain. Then I wrote a note the best I could. "I don't know why you are sitting on a man's lap that isn't my father." I crumbled the note up into a ball and threw it on the floor. I ran out and decided I wouldn't come back till it was very late, no matter what.

When I came back my mother was waiting for me on the couch. She wasn't smiling and looked severe. She didn't ask me where I had been despite it being unusually late for me to come home. She told me to sit besides her and she explained that father had been away for a long time and she was lonely. I remember her hairdo in a bun over her forehead and the deep red color of her long pointed fingernails. She didn't apologize for ignoring me the night before. She explained that every one can get lonely and she was no different. I heard her out and said nothing. When she was done, I just shook my head and went to my bedroom.

The next day she made things infinitely worse. When I came home from school she told me to sit down on the couch. She took out of her purse an unwrapped cheap toy, like those one buys at the checkouts in supermarkets. She told me the man who had been with her had bought it for me because I was a good boy. I didn't believe her. I felt deeply misunderstood and insulted that she thought I could be bribed like that. That she thought I would believe such a brazen lie. I was wordless and took the toy and went into my room and promptly broke it. But I said nothing to her. To anyone. I was ashamed of her behavior to the bottom of my soul. I was maybe not quite seven years old and I had no ideas how babies come into the world. But everything inside me protested her behavior instinctively. I thought about my father and how I could never tell him what I had seen, what I had been told. She didn't ask me to keep it a secret, she didn't have to.

Soon after this we traveled by plane to Israel. It was a long trip. My father was waiting for us at Ben Gurion Airport. He had a bouquet of flowers for my mother. We spent a few days in a hotel in  Tel Aviv and then took the bus to Eilat. It was a journey of six or seven hours through the dessert. Eilat was a small town on the border with Egypt and my father was contemplating the purchase of a business there, perhaps a small hotel. My memories of Eilat are very vivid. The mountains around the sea were jagged and sharp, the sea was crystal clear and the smell of sewage was common in the streets. I must have been in the second grade. No one really spoke any English at the school I went to. Everything was foreign about it. I daydreamed a lot. I made some friends, children  who were from England and we went for long walks in the mountains. Once I found an ancient coin and my father  took it from me and gave it to my mother on a necklace. This reminded me of when she had taken the best of the Halloween candy we had gathered and brought it to my father.

Soon enough my parents could be heard yelling at each other as we came home from school. It seems my mother insisted in wearing a piece of Jewelry her lover had given her. It was a necklace with a black opal. She told my father he had been just a friend. Obviously, she wanted to infuriate him. break his heart, prepare him for divorce.

Once a missionary came to the little apartment my father had rented us. I was there with my mother and sister. I was never more than vaguely aware of my siblings presence or absence. He sat down and he and my mother began a conversation. He wanted to share a gift with her and took out of his leather case a Christian Bible. My mother said she doesn't want it and she thinks it best he should leave, preferably before my father came home. He just grew more insistent on sharing his glorious truth. My father came in and immediately understood what was going on. He told us to leave and we had barely made it to the bottom of the stairs when the missionary came flying down the stairs himself, my father having literally tossed him out by the seat of his pants.

My father found no suitable business in Eilat. After just a few months we returned to the United States on an ocean liner called The Olympia. It was 1963, sometime around Passover. This is where my mother met her new lover, the one who was to become her second husband and the father of her next two sons. She would disappear for hours on the ship. I have no idea how she explained this to my father. Her lover was a Moroccan immigrant to Israel who was abandoning a wife and two children in pursuit of a better life in America. All I remember of him on the ship was that he and my father toasted each other on The Seder night as they were each conducting the Seder ceremony at neighboring tables and must have been familiar with each other.

I also remember that we stopped on the way to New York in Athens and I saw the Pantheon, for which I felt an inexplicable hostility. And then we stopped at Pompeii and the wretched images of a man and a dog captured by lava in a grotesque posture for posterity were engraved painfully in my mind. My father told me once, may years later,  that Pompeii was destroyed as punishment for the Roman's destruction of The Temple in Jerusalem. If I remember correctly, I thought that made sense.

When we arrived in New York it was unseasonably cold and it was snowing. We were collected by my mother's father and went south to Maryland. My father soon left for Porto Rico, looking for business, intent on leaving the US for reasons I don't know. That was the last time I ever saw my father and mother together, coming off the Olympia.

We stay with my mother's family a few days. I have nightmares every night, finally overcoming them by telling myself I welcome them as an adventure in a different world. The nightmares stopped after this and I was almost slightly disappointed.

School is a confusion. I don't know what is going on, just wait for the day to end. My mother has rented us an apartment, three children and her. My older sister lives with our grandparents.  I wake up early and try to help by preparing breakfast for my younger siblings. My mother doesn't seem pleased by this, I think it just made her feel more guilty. Suddenly her now lover comes to live with us, just like that. But they often fight. I can hear her saying loudly, "Don't touch me!" I hate him and my mother sends me to live with her parents for a while. Suzie and I trade places. They  live nearby, help out. My grandmother Sylvia had suffered from manic depression all her life.

Then I move back with my mother. Things just happen. No explanations. Finally, one winter night in the middle of the third grade, must have been 1964, my mother packs our stuff in cardboard boxes and sends my older sister Suzie, me, and my younger brother Daniel to our father in New York City. He has dyed his hair black. He picks us up at the bus station and I can't stop crying. He buys me a cheap watch and that doesn't help. Finally he takes us to a Godzilla movie and I am distracted and calm down. We stay in a cheap hotel in Manhattan for a few months. My father gets a  very needed serendipitous tax return  from the time he was a millionaire and he buys a house in Canarsie Brooklyn. We have a live in maid for a while from Bolivia who has a son of her own. But that ends and I don't know why. I start the fourth grade at P.S 242.

My father meets the woman who is to become his fifth wife and bare him twin daughters. Her name is Malcah.

The Miraculous Story of My Father and His Fifth Wife Malcah

When Malcah comes to live with us with her first born son, Itamar, from a previous marriage, we start off very well. She introduces me to classical music which we listen to together. She has books with pictures of art from ancient times until  the modern. We look together at the pictures. But there are some troubling issues between us. First, I used to get three dollars a week from my father for cleaning and straightening up the house, the best I could. She fires me. I always had had an enterprising spirit and used o tmake pocket money by helping people carry their shopping bags to their cars in the parking lot, at the large grocery store across the street.

Malcah  also insisted I call her Mother, which I simply couldn't. My father tells me, "Be smart, call her mommy! She is better to you than your real mother ever was!" But I couldn't anyway. Malcah is very energetic and romantic at heart. We start singing Friday night Hebrew songs together. She had been a Hebrew Teacher. That's how she met my father. She speaks to me for real, like no one ever had before in my life. I feel I love her. But I can't call her Mother. I see her as a friend. I am acutely aware of her body, all the time. I want to be near to her, look at her, talk to her. When she gets undressed and I see her in her bra, I can't help staring. She stops undressing near me, in my presence.

 Malcah gets pregnant and soon we find out she has twins in her belly.  I save money and buy her a little colorfull gold plaited ship which I give her as a present, as she is in bed. She is very pregnant and doesn't move around much. She seems very joyed at my gift. Finally she gives birth and nearly dies. She has a hemorrhage and the doctors bring her back from the brink of death. My father's hair turns completely white overnight. Had she died he would have been left with two infant girls, the four of us and Malcah's son.

Malcah comes home and one night she cleans the bathroom where I had left droplets of urine on the floor. I was prone to day dreaming all the time. She had written in lip stick, " I aim to please, you aim too, please!" I wet the floor anyway. She was on her hands and her knees and she started to bleed profusely. She called out and people came and carried her away on a chair, taking her to the hospital immediately. Again, she nearly died. She didn't come home for weeks. My sister Suzie took care of the twins with a responsibility far beyond her age. Suzie married young, moved to the US  and started to suffer from severe schizophrenia, got divorced and lost her children. But when she was just 13 years old she was like an adult in how she coped. She never liked me very much, though. She always had cruel things to say to me about me. I don't really know why.

Anyway, when Malcah came home her attitude towards me completely changed. Sometimes she would shower me with affection, physical and emotional. But that was rare. More often she would criticize me for everything I did. It was very confusing.

My father got a job as a Rabbi and we moved first to Beacon, New York and then to Mount Vernon. Sometimes Malcah would sit me on her lap and hug me, tickle me, make me laugh and shout out. She was very physical in her affections for everyone. She would sit on my father's lap and he would yell at her to get off. But sometimes I saw him hug her from behind and hold on to her breasts while she was doing dishes.

At other times she would be very cruel to me, sadistic. When we were still in Beacon, she got us a dog I personally didn't want. I had never been able to feel affection for dogs after the sick one my mother had shown me in the shed, which died shortly afterwards. Malcah had us all gather together one evening, and smiled as she told me, it would be my job to wipe the dog's ass after he took a shit. She had prepared some toilet paper and told me the dog needed a wipe. I moved towards the dog and proceeded to try and hold it still as I did what I believed was needed. Why would any one lie about something like that? I was so incredibly gullible, so deeply naive, yet quite intelligent when it came to understanding complex stories or abstract ideas. Malcah laughed and the whole family laughed with her. I was embarrassed and shamed. This became a favorite family story of Malcah's, told when I would come home for weekends from boarding school over the years to come.

But while so inexplicably cruel, Malcah was often very warm and affectionate with me.  I began to feel an overwhelming desire to be touched by her and when she hugged me and let me lay next to her,  I began to get pronounced erections which was a novelty for me. I hadn't yet learned to masturbate or anything like that. I can't say whether she noticed this or not. I was torn with conflicting feelings. My need for physical intimacy, hugging and caresses was a constant craving. Sometimes I got what I wanted and sometimes Malcah would behave hatefully at me. " We are not going to buy you your school supplies because you don't deserve them!" She wouldn't explain why. She would repeat this in variations on a theme, until I would cry. I felt I was sinning against my father, by wanting to be touched by Malcah so much. But I couldn't help myself.

And my father had outbursts of hostility towards me. In retrospect, I know Malcah was constantly complaining about me. Once, I was at a lesson he was giving to children of the congregation in Beacon. It was something about Jewish history and I knew very little. My father had returned to being a Rabbi after years of living a non religious and mostly secular life, the years I had grown up with him and my mother together. My ignorance exposed his past, I assume. Anyway, when I couldn't answer a question others could, he slapped me in front of all the other children. The shame was much worse than the pain.

On another occasion, in Mount Vernon, before I was sent away, my father believed us to be late on a Friday after noon and told me to hurry and get dressed as I used to walk with him to the synagogue for Shabbat prayers. He thought I was being lazy and tardy and began to hit me and kicked me to the floor. I knew I had done nothing wrong and refused to apologize, infuriating him. H hit me a few times, yelling "Cry, Cry!" and instead of crying, I remembered how he came into the smoke engulfed room in the hotel fire in Phoenix and also yelled "Cry! Cry! Cry so I can see where you are!" and he lifted me and carried me to safety. Finally he relented. As we walked to the Synagogue we passed a large clock at a train station and my father saw that he was wrong about the time. He didn't apologize, he just told me sheepishly that I must have deserved it for some other reason.

It all came to a crescendo when Malcah told my father that either he send me away to a boarding school, or she would leave him. She shouted this out loud for everyone to hear. In a few weeks I was driven to a Yeshivah boarding school in Baltimore. My father drove me there and I can't recall any conversation on the seven hour drive. When we arrived, we both went to the bathroom and used the urinal. I remember my father staining his pants with urine and cursing under his breath. Why do I remember this? Why do I write it here? I revered my father but he didn't like me. I told myself I was helping him by agreeing without protest to be sent away. But I must have been angry at him for abandoning me to Malcah's whim, too. So pictures that were degrading to him would stick in my mind, confusing expressions of my self denied hostilities. It happens to all of us.

Soon he left me with my suitcase and just a few dollars. I waited for the principle outside his office, under the care of his red headed secretary. She made me tea. Her young daughter was with her, a child of maybe six or seven years old with cascading red curls, like her mother. . I thought she was very cute and she flirted with me, smiling and playing hide and seek with her face and the desk her mother was working at.

Little girls have liked me all my life. It has been a recurring and comforting motif. When I was just eight or nine, I had a friend, a Black American child in the third grade with me in Manhattan. We were the brightest children in the class and I would visit him at home. His little sister used to fawn on me, hold my hand and beg me to stay. When I was just seven, still with my mother, there was a little girl named Ginger who was the daughter of a friend of my mother, a divorced woman who lived in the same apartment complex. Ginger used to dance for me on the bed and remove her clothes. I never really understood at the time why she and other girls so wanted me to look at their intimate parts. It happened a lot.

After an hour or so, the principle came and invited me into his office. He had a black Yarmulke on his head, was clean shaven and wore a black vest, slightly overweight and not so tall. He closed the door behind us and asked if he could kiss me, which he proceeded to do on my cheek before I could answer. His lips were wet and he hugged me to him but I moved away quickly and went to the other side of the desk. He said something like, " I Just want you to feel welcome..." and proceeded to become business like explaining the rules and what life is like in the dormitory of some 75 boarding school students, from grade seven like me, to those in the twelfth grade. It must have been in October or the beginning of November , 1968.  On my first night, the boys interrogated me about what exactly happened in Rabbi Shapiro's office. His affection for young boys was renown.

I was put into the third grade for Hebrew studies,  because I knew nothing in Hebrew and felt very clumsy and out of place in a classroom with children who were eight years old and simply much smaller than me, physically. I remember the first lesson I learned in Hebrew, from the book of Genesis. Abraham sitting in his tent in the heat of the day, seeing the three angels approach. We would read the Hebrew and the Rabbi would translate word by word and linger sometimes on the Rashi interpretations too, which was written in different confusing letters than the Hebrew scriptures. I was bored terribly. But somehow, though in a daze, I believe I remember everything I l;earned in that class of the narrative itself. I felt a deep desire to know Hebrew. I even went so far as to tell myself I would forget all my English if only I could completely understand and speak Hebrew.

There is one word that stands out in my mind of all the words I learned then in Hebrew. I can still see it written in Hebrew letters on the blackboard. The Rabbi took time to explain the word,

 "The Knife".  המאכלת

It can be translated as "That which consumes." and the words "Consuming Fire אש אוכלה " that describe God, use the same root א כ ל,  which means "to eat" or "to consume".

The word is used when it says Abraham lifted his knife to slaughter his son Isaac, and then before he did, an angel called out from the heavens and told him not to send forth his hand and slaughter his own, first born son in obedience to God.  His willingness to do so is unfathomable except to prophets.

In the evenings after school. I got to know the other kids at the dormitory. There were Playboy magazines hid under mattresses and poker sessions. There was pornographic literature with stories of incest and sexual fantasies.

Shortly after I arrived, I was taken against my will into the room of the fattest and believed to be the smelliest kid in the dorm. I was pushed into his bed and I had my shirt removed and ketchup and mustard were smeared all over me. It was not as traumatic as you might think. It was done in jovial spirits and I was told "After this, you will be just like any one of us!" While it was being done, I kept thinking "I hope so."

I suffered terribly from having no money at all.  Once I stole some loose change from the top of the dresser. It couldn't have been more than a dollar or two. The missing change was immediately noticed and as I was alone in the room, I was also the most obvious suspect. There were two other kids in the room, significantly older than me. They closed the door and told me they wouldn't let me out until I confessed.  I was ashamed of myself to the core of my being but wouldn't come clean. Finally, they let me go to the bathroom where I took the coins out of my pocket and put them on the floor. Then I called them and told them that I had found the money on the bathroom floor and that was proof it wasn't me who stole it.  They looked at me with pity and let me be.

Even before I had ever actually masturbated to orgasm I craved pornography. It was on my mind all the time. There was a paperback book with a story about a kid, a teenager who hangs out in a park and is picked up by an older woman. She bathes him and caresses him intimately in the bathtub, then dries him and feeds him. He keeps coming back to her and she seduces him completely. It was while reading this story that I had my first orgasm. I was touching myself under the covers while reading and the sudden flush of  sensation was an overwhelming surprise. I was though, very ashamed, and felt like I was somehow perverted. I didn't know that everyone else was masturbating with the pornography too. The words "dirty pictures" and "dirty stories" contaminated the whole activity of reading and looking and touching myself.

Whatever was going on with my brain chemistry, I was quickly overcome with a constant horny throb that was like a magnet, pulling all my thoughts and calculations towards one goal, the next time I can get my hands on something to read or look at and jerk off to. I would take a break to go to the bathroom during my morning Hebrew lessons and bring myself to orgasm while sitting on the toilet. I did it two or three times a day. I was insatiable.

Once I was busy beating away when I heard a noise and looked up to see one of the kids in my class looking down at me from the top of the stall. He had climbed up to spy on me. I had never felt such hostility in my life. I wanted to kill him, but did nothing, said nothing. He said to me tauntingly, "I saw what you did! I am gonna tell the Rabbi!" with a big grin on his face.  I walked out and back to the class feeling like I hate everyone and everything. The Rabbi never said anything to me. I began to shoot little pieces of  paper rolled up with saliva at the kids in the class. I had realized that the Rabbi was non confrontational. I wasn't afraid of him. The kids just giggled and I was never disciplined for it.

I would take long walks in the surrounding neighborhood at night. It was very cold and I shivered but walked anyway, looking at the lights beyond the curtains, wondering what it was like to live in the same place for years, to have a mother and father and a family around oneself. The homes looked like dollhouses to me. They weren't too big. I would imagine some girl standing in a doorway, inviting me in to watch television. We would sit on the floor with a blanket over our knees and eat potato chips. Nothing even remotely like this ever happened, of course. But I kept trying, hoping, maybe tonight?

I was very homesick . I wrote my father a letter asking to come home for the Hanukkah vacation of nine days. He sent me money for the bus. He and Malcah picked me up at the central station. The Yeshiva was far more religious than my family. In the Yeshiva there was no listening to the radio on Saturday, no putting on lights. When I mentioned this to them perhaps critically, they just laughed at me for becoming a Yeshiva Bachor, implying I was brainwashed and couldn't think for myself. I have no memories whatsoever of empathy from anyone in my childhood, ever, except somewhat dimly from a school teacher on occasion.

Weeks passed and became months. It was time for my Bar Mitsvah. I was approaching 13. I had barely learned what I was supposed to read in Hebrew in front of the small crowd of my father and Malcah's respective families and congregation members. I was, as usual, pretty much in a daze. I read the speech my father had written for me mechanically, just wanting it all to be over quickly. I got some gifts.  A few books with glossy pictures of Jerusalem and Israel. An alarm clock. I don't remember what else. I think it was Joan, my mother who sent the clock. Other than half a day after two years of separation, I hadn't seen her since that winter night she sent us away. We had no connection.

Joan had kept Deborah, the youngest, with her when she sent us away. Debbie must have been two years old or so. Joan took Debbie with her to Israel where she went with her lover, Avi. Somehow they went to Eilat and Joan abandoned Debbie with neighbors and chased her lover to Europe. These neighbors contacted my father who sent a plane ticket for Debbie when she was just over three. We picked her up at the air port and she had sores on her legs, was very thin and barely spoke. She would  get up at night and walk in her sleep. She grew up just fine though, married young, had lots of kids. I barely know her. Last time I saw her was after Joan had died. She approached me at a wedding of Malcah's grandson and said, " My condolences for your loss!" with a big grin on her face. I was at a complete loss for words. I think she was upset that I hadn't come to a wedding for one of her children as it was far away and there was no convenient transportation and I really couldn't afford a gift. As I said, I and Debbie had not spoken to each other for decades other than a few brief exchanges at the few  weddings I did attend over the years.

When summer finally came, I arrived back into the family life as a very horny and constantly aroused introverted new adolescent. I had stolen a pornographic book I read and masturbated to it on the bus for hours.   Of course when I got home,  my attention was riveted on Malcah, who again oscillated between ravishing me with attention and affection and glaring at me testily or completely ignoring me. Shortly after I arrived, my father went to Israel on business. Malcah didn't like to sleep alone, apparently and her son Itamar, who must have been 7 or 8, had spent a few nights with her.  Itamar and I   were in her bedroom and she said something like, "Tonight you can sleep with me, its your turn." And I flat out refused abruptly  and left the room. I had never told my father about the night I had found Joan sitting on that stranger's lap. I had always felt sorry for him, I knew he had loved her very much and she had betrayed him terribly, broken the sixth of the ten commandments. My mother's adultery was always near the surface of my mind. When Malcah suggested I spend a night with her there was no hesitancy on my part, I reacted as instinctively as I did to my mother's infidelity. I am not saying Malcah was aware of how obsessed I was with her, I am not saying that she aroused me sexually, knowingly, consciously, and with intent. Malcah never impressed me as being particularly self aware. She is however very emotional and spontaneous, volatile and instinctual. Who knows? Many people have all kinds of urges they can't explain. I still do.

The summer ended and I returned to the Yeshiva for a few more months. At some point the Principal told me that my father wasn't paying my tuition. I didn't know what to say. I was always broke myself as he barely gave me any more money than the bus and taxi fair. I worked on Sundays mowing grass sometimes.

My best memories from the Yeshiva have most to do with listening to Simon and Garfunkel.  I couldn't get enough of them. The words of their songs went around in circles in my mind together with their melodies. I wanted to love a girl the way girls were loved in their songs. Someday I would, too. A number of times, as matter of fact. I have been very blessed in things that are important.
This song in particular seemed to be about me.

"Patterns"


The night sets softly
With the hush of falling leaves,
Casting shivering shadows
On the houses through the trees,
And the light from a street lamp
Paints a pattern on my wall,
Like the pieces of a puzzle
Or a child's uneven scrawl.

Up a narrow flight of stairs
In a narrow little room,
As I lie upon my bed
In the early evening gloom.
Impaled on my wall
My eyes can dimly see
The pattern of my life
And the puzzle that is me.

From the moment of my birth
To the instant of my death,
There are patterns I must follow
Just as I must breathe each breath.
Like a rat in a maze
The path before me lies,
And the pattern never alters
Until the rat dies.

And the pattern still remains
On the wall where darkness fell,
And it's fitting that it should,
For in darkness I must dwell.
Like the color of my skin,
Or the day that I grow old,
My life is made of patterns
That can scarcely be controlled.

Patterns

I was taken out of the boarding school Yeshiva sometime in October, 1969. My father and Malcah had decided to make Aliyah, Transcendence, move to Israel. Suzie, Daniel and I were to go first, to boarding schools. Suzie to one and Daniel and I to another.  This was a momentous decision and I was very happy with it. I had deep, deep feelings for Israel and Jews. I can't say really why. Perhaps because my father did? But he hadn't always. Somehow his meeting Malcah had renewed his faith in The God of Israel. I noted this to myself. It was a factor in why I had faith. I saw my father saved and how he saved us. His meeting Malcah was so serendipitous, it must have been God taking care of him, taking care of us. And there was how he got that tax return exactly when we so needed it.

The God of The Hebrew Bible was perhaps confused and caused chaos, but sometimes He came through for you when you most needed Him.  Maybe He was lonely and mankind just didn't meet His needs for company? These were the kinds of thoughts I occupied myself with a lot, when I wasn't feeling horny and jerking off.

Monday, March 20, 2017

Is There An Objective Reality

The foundation of  reasoning is based on the postulated assumption that there is existence outside the mind that is independent of the mind for its existence. I agree. God. Whatever God is, God exists out side the mind and causes the mind to come into existence as a sequence of perceptions in a field of cross references, associations and patterns that become sensations cross referenced again spatially and temporally, becoming the conscious mind. The development of the mind can be likened to a growing sphere which contains ever more complex extrapolations based on an ever growing archive which is continually cross referenced causing ever greater sophistication and intricacy. All the growing dynamic cross referenced relationships in the mind are founded on logic and mathematics. Because of this communication is possible between minds.

From this one might assume that mathematics, as the quality common to all minds, logic- that describes that portion of the mind most of us have the potential to share, is the basis for the objective reality you found your reasoning on.

objective :(of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.

The key word here is "facts". This word brings us back to Descartes. It is a fact that we all have minds because we all think and our thinking is governed by the logic of linguistics and math. This is true I assume for a dog, too. The difference being that the human mind has a dimension of linguistic agility that allows for a degree of abstract symbolization that has a metaphysical nature. By manipulating symbols that represent shared realities, according to mathematical reasoning, it becomes possible to predict the behavior of the shared realities and shape their structure. Man can carve rock out of mountains and make stone buildings to live in. His mind has gained an aspect of being able to create and destroy the shared reality. Just as his own mind is the product of influences beyond his control in a series of comings together and falling apart, just as man's mind coalesces and grows and then with age, dissipates and dissolves as the effect of unknown causes, so man causes the common world, that of the mind which is shared by most, to come together in new ways and he demonstrates an ever growing ability to manipulate that which exists in the mind and is common to all living things.

But things have the appearance that the substance of the common mind started before the appearance of an individual man's mind. Our mind comes to be in a world which appears to have existed before us. People die and the world goes on. We assume it will continue after we die. Here again, I say that which predates the mind of man, exists beyond the borders of potential perception spatially and temporally, and continues after the mind dissipates back into the oblivion from which it emerges, is cause over the mind and is the mind's creator, God.

The mind is designed and the mind designs, intelligently. However, That which designs the mind, exists beyond the mathematics and logic and shared realities of the mind. That which creates the mind is not subject to the laws that govern the mind.

All the math and logic in the mind of man cannot predict how a quantum particle will behave except as a potential manifestation registered in man's mind once he looks at it a certain way. If he looks at it differently, he will see something else. On the other hand, enormous collections of the same kind of particles so uncertain in their behavior, particles that can potentially appear on either end of the universe if looked for there, behave en masse as planets and stars in ways that are perfectly predictable on a certain scale of observation using math. However, the same conglomerates of mass, demonstrate completely unpredictable behavior on the scale of galaxies.

Math no longer can be used to predict what is going to happen on very large scales and very small scales. Things happen outside the realms of logic. Some creative force holds the universe together and makes it expand at the same time, in ways completely foreign to the workings of man's mind. Time and space only apply to the workings of the mind and that which is in it, and don't apply to the creator of the mind, or even that part of the mind held in common, your "objective reality".

Modern science says there is no knowable objective reality.

"The world presented to us by our perceptions is nothing like reality. What’s more, he says, we have evolution itself to thank for this magnificent illusion, as it maximizes evolutionary fitness by driving truth to extinction."
"“Useful as it is under ordinary circumstances to say that the world exists ‘out there’ independent of us, that view can no longer be upheld.”
 Is there an Objective Reality?
God rules supreme because God causes the wave functions to collapse in the sequence they do, creating the narrative in our minds that becomes our life story.

_________________
A Catastrophic Tragedy. Maybe Not!

29283812363938/11=2662164760358

Jonathan Michael Robbins

= 939=

יונתן מיכאל רבינס


 
View user's profile Send private message

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

The Economics Of Pleasure and Pain

All living organisms, from the most primitive virus to the most sophisticated of mankind, demonstrate intelligent realization of five primal motivations, these being:

1. The Creation of Valuable Manifestations, the first of these being the creation and reproduction of self. We are all motivated to express ourselves and realize the fullness of our nature over time. The more primitive the life form, the more reproduction is chemical duplication and the more sophisticated the life form, the more valuable manifestations are of a mental and abstract nature such as in Art or Politics, as well as physical reproduction with far more genetic variables as happens when male and female entities reproduce, in plants and sundry kinds of animals among them  mammals like us. Every living creature of every kind survives by turning something  into something else. This is as true for viruses which turn microbes and human cells into virus factories as well as shoemakers, who turn cows into shoes. All living things manifest some kind of self creation through nutrition and nutrition itself is self creation by breaking something down into elements and then building one self up with the elements thus attained, manifesting this way self creation, which is a valuable manifestation, is it not?

2. The Maintenance and Preservation of Valuable Manifestations, this being the continued acquirement of the means of mechanization of self reproduction and the acquirement of nutrients to enable the perpetuation of self creation. This also means the removal of toxic waste from within the areas of self creation (self manifestation) and the constant removal of materiel detrimental to self creation from the environment, such as dirt and dust and germs and dirty laundry. Cleaning one's self and one's  blood relatives from invasive elements on a routine basis is an act of maintenance seen in higher life forms like cats and monkeys of all kinds.

3. The Multiplication and Expansion of Valuable Manifestations is the logical consequence of creation, preservation and maintenance. As long as these activities are maintained over time, the quantity of organisms will grow exponentially and occupy an ever growing space in the biosphere, as well as maintain self identity for an ever growing duration. One might liken this to an ever growing, self sustaining bubble of reproducing life entities, that share nearly identical or very similar DNA.  Each one of these biological bubbles competes for living space and assets on the level of the individual organisms such as in sibling rivalry as well as on  far vaster scales where each species spreads out throughout the biosphere, enveloping ever more space, changing the nature of the environment by turning everything it can into an extension of its self or into an asset for survival. Everything alive from the level of any kind of living cell is a composite of living entities cooperating in a symbiotic relationship of self perpetuation, suggesting that conflict and the annihilation of other life forms isn't always necessary for increasing self duration. 

4. Multiplication and Expansion inevitably lead to barriers that prevent the increase of living space or the multiplication of the number of organisms. Therefor Attacking Barriers to Expansion and Overcoming Inhibitions to Multiplication is The Fourth Valuable Manifestation. This is less an issue for more "primitive" microscopic organisms that live in the sea, not an issue for the vast majority of viral life forms and becomes an increasing issue for more sophisticated  land based organisms for whom living space is more a survival issue than creatures of the sea. Microbes and viruses overcome barriers to expansion through mutation. Land animals through migration. The development  of means to overcome barriers to expansion is mostly expressed in the affairs of human beings and was most pronounced in the history of past empires up to modern times as warfare and the development of weapons intended to defeat and remove barriers to the expansion of national entities and their political, cultural and economic interests.  Whatever the kind of organism, if it is unable to increase its living space or fails to remove and dispose of its waste products, it will eventually poison itself with its own toxic secretions. This was a means of waging war against walled cities, as in a siege the population was prevented the acquirement of sustenance as well as prevented from removing waste products, causing the widespread of disease. The germs and sundry disease causing microbes were happy about this, I am sure. Today more than ever, overcoming barriers to the expansion of political, military, economic, ideological, technology, surveillance, etc., Valuable Manifestations  into the minds of ever more individuals, is a prime focus for the application of  human intelligence as such expresses itself in social media on the internet. It has all become an activity of the mind. Perhaps it always was?

5. The Fifth  Valuable Manifestation is The Demonstration of the Ability to Defend One's Self and One's Assets from the encroachment of foreign influences intent on turning one's self  into "nutrients" by breaking one's self down into more basic ingredients for a foreign entity's consumption, thus corrupting and destroying one's identity. One can defend one's self through retreat if there is living space available elsewhere, but by the nature of life itself, this can only be a temporary solution.   One can also defend one's self by waging war against the invading foreign influence, first within one's own living space, by using antibiotics for example, when germs encroach or through preventive measures such as vaccines against pathogenic microbes and viruses. On a larger scale one can resort to building ghettos and then deporting and exterminating Jews, if one sees their being as a threat against one's own identity, for example. Manifesting Self Defense is definitely a  necessity, life behaving as it does, endlessly seeking to self propagate and expand at the expense of other life forms when it can't cultivate them and enter into a symbiotic exchange of  mutual Valuable Manifestation as exists between humans and chickens, for example, though some might argue that chickens are being abused as regards the quality of their life when compared to human beings.

We can sum these motivations up by summarizing them as , Create, Preserve, Expand, Attack and Defend.

Now I wish to postulate that these five intents are all it takes to understand the behavior of all living things, but of  particular interest, human behavior.

First it is demonstrable that human procreation produces groups of competing entities on an organic level, as said before in sibling rivalry, as well as on a far more complex, sophisticated and abstract level, as in the rivalry between great business corporations. Whatever be the nature of the asset, once it is deemed an asset, every one is trying to create valuable self serving manifestations of attainment, preservation and expansion of the quantity and  quality of the self serving valuable asset. This is glaringly obvious in relationship to something as abstract as money. If one makes money by producing shoes and exchanging them for money, leather becomes a valuable asset. One strives to acquire leather, preserve that so acquired, expand one's inventory so as to meet the needs of a hopefully growing market and ever improve the quality of leather attained so as to increase the value of one's shoes and finally the sum of money received in exchange for them. One does the same thing with the money received. One strives to ever increase sales locations and volume so as to increase revenue. The greater the interest received for money accumulated and growing in bank accounts, the higher its value. And so and so on.

Once value is assigned to something, whatever it be, however strange its nature, a human being will begin to manifest these behaviors regarding it. On a materiel  level, food, clothing and shelter are examples of things people want more of. But what about something far more abstract, like an education? One values the attainment of knowledge itself for different possible reasons, the foremost and most common being financial. One learns a profession or a trade so as to attain the finances needed to acquire food, clothing and expansive living space, as well as the valuable manifestation of sex and the attainment of a mate and the production of similar versions of one's self, offspring.  Obviously, everything is somehow connected. Values compete in one's mind for attention and energy.

If one likens the mind to the biosphere, one could say different values compete for valuable self manifestation in the mind and to do so, compete with other values, often causing internal strife and conflict. The most vital asset for manifestation in the mind, is attention. Everything we give value to, for whatever reason, biological to cultural, competes for attention in the mind and attention is allocated or inhibited based on the valuable manifestation of different kinds of pleasures or the alleviation of pains, making everything far easier to comprehend, for here we have the most essential values there are, all the kinds of joy and pleasure one can know and experience, , and the prevention of every kind of distress, discomfort and pain imaginable.

No matter what we would like to think about our selves, it all boils down to the economics of pleasure and pain, however abstract these might be. Some people place so much value on spiritual pleasures that they are willing to endure and suffer great physical deprivation to the scorn and amazement of those whose hierarchy of values is opposite. If one values the pleasure of eating above the pleasure of sex, one is likely to grow to proportions that make sex impossible. If one values the pleasures of being respected for one's affluence more than one's moral integrity, one will cheat to get rich.

The complexity of mental activity is do to the allocation of value to substances and abstractions and the consequent manifestation of these primal intents accordingly in the space of one's mind.

Let's say one highly values social contribution but has low self esteem and one harbors the idea that one is detrimental to the well being of one's neighbors. Such an idea might have been acquired from a parent in their attempt to shape the mind of an offspring, by telling them how important it is to get along socially and how worthless and lazy they are when they spend all day watching television. A consequence to this is self destructive attitudes and behaviors as one's "goodness" tries to get rid of one's "badness" as a Valuable Manifestation. The mind is compartmentalized into  spheres of competing priorities and every single moment of mental activity is the allocation of value to that sphere of internal activity which is deemed most productive of the overall experience of pleasure,  based on the economics of pleasure attainment and the lessening and prevention of pain for the duration of life and in every location one finds one's self in.

Its all that simple.


Monday, March 13, 2017

Roosters, Eggs and Chickens Come Together

Everyone has heard the riddle, "What came first, the chicken or the egg?"
The way this question is posed exemplifies the problem of modern science.
Should one answer the question as asked, without identifying it's false premise,
one will encounter strange phenomena, like time going backwards.
Lets say that the chicken comes first, for whatever reason we do.
Probably because to be fully understood, things must have a beginning.
Well if we encounter then an egg that becomes a chicken,
either we recognize we were wrong about the chicken coming first
or we witness time flowing backwards, something we know it can't do.
If we say the egg comes first and then encounter first a chicken
either we recognize we were wrong, or again time flows the wrong way.
But even if we recognize were are wrong, we will encounter the same dilemma,
the first time we encounter a reversal of what we expect.
Now every complete egg laying chicken has a potential egg inside it
and every complete chicken egg, has a potential chicken inside it.
Whether one encounters this or that, makes no difference,
once one comprehends that chickens and eggs are one and the same
but only look different because we can't see them both at the same time.
Just as we can't see both sides of a coin at the same time,
the coin is always both heads and tails, one and the same coin,
but can only be seen in its entirety, in a sequence of observation
that can start on either side, it doesn't matter what comes first.
The chicken and the coin exist outside of time as an idea.
They have a narrative which is the same in both directions,
because they are both complete unto themselves
and immutable as abstract ideas that exist in the common mind.
1+2=3 is just as much true as  2+1=3  as 3=1+2 or 3=2+1
these are ideas that exist outside of time and space as a singularity.
An idea that can be perceived with the sequence being inconsequential,
but can only be perceived in a sequence to be fully understood.
Left to right or right to left is the same thing in an equation.
Top of the coin can be either heads or tails
as long as one looks at both sides
before making up one's mind about the picture on the coin.
Same with the chicken.
One can only understand chickens after seeing them emerge from eggs
and then see them have eggs themselves.
One can only understand eggs by seeing them emerge from chickens
and then see chickens emerge from eggs.
The world inside our minds is made of timeless ideas with no location
but in our minds. Ideas about objects of all kinds
and the symbols that represent them.
Things both real and imaginary. Real like the thought of a kiss,
and the tender feelings on one's lips, or imaginary= like a fairy,
one can see with one's own eyes. But no one else can.
Our minds are full of objects and ideas that can only be conceived
if we hear about them in the telling of a story.
If we hear about them in a sequence of impressions in our imaginations,
words that represent ideas that represent objects,
objects that come together and then become something else.
No chicken can have a chicken producing egg,
without a rooster to come together with! And roosters are chickens too,
but they don't have eggs. And some eggs  become roosters
and roosters are chickens that don't lay eggs.
A little bit here and a little bit there,
the greater the context, the more we understand.
We should never freeze our minds into graven images
of how things just have to be.
Doing so causes heartbreak and despair,
because we cling to our incomplete ideas,
and try to stop them from growing into chickens
because we make a living selling eggs.
Or we run out of chickens because we eat them all
before they have laid us sufficient eggs.
Now a narrative is always just a means
to understand a greater story.
And no story is complete without a lesson learned,
and a moral that stays true, long after the story is over.
An infinite number of stories can have the same lesson
and the same moral learned.
Morals are like equations, they are always true.
If you learn a lesson that says you know before you look,
you certainly haven't heard enough.
Scientists think they know how things should be,
but now they find that things just aren't what they know.
It's either this or that or both depending what you look for.
But they are really both, one and the same.
Timeless ideas that exist no place but in the mind
and  those  give shape and form and sequences of time,
events that happen in synchronized rhyme.
Its more than just music, its the story of your life.

Math and Reason Only Define The Common Mind

    Logic and mathematics describe the way we experience in our mind, a partial revelation of the universe around it. What we experience in our mind of the universe that surrounds it, can only be the basis for a premise about what is really out there,   a premise of experiential facts  upon which we extrapolate and theorize, using logic and math. But all we can be certain about, is that logic and math describe our experiences of manipulating symbols that represent further potentials of experience, potentials that always and by axiomatic truth, can only be realized in the confines of our own minds.
     We presume the existence of radio magnetic waves and sound waves based on mathematical calculations with which we can predict our own experiences in the realm of measurable heat and light and sound. When we do an experiment, we are initiating a chain of events that starts and ends in the realm of the measurable and visible and heard. Our theories and calculations deal with that which happens between the initiation of the experiment and the registration of the result. Theorems describe what we believe transpires in the invisible and unknowable chain of events that we presume takes place in the real universe, the universe we presume exists independently of our minds. All we know for certain is the result of our measurements because that is what we retrieve from what ever is going on, with our senses and in our minds.
    As our minds all share to some degree, the qualities of logic and coherence, the math we use to create formulas that describe the behavior of reality outside the realm of our experience  is common to all minds whether they know math or not. We share the common experiences predicted by math and logic. When experiments yield the same results when performed under the same conditions, the theories that allow the prediction of the results are given validity. This proves the similarity of our minds and how they are constructed, not the true nature of what transpires to information that is traveling between our minds and outside them.  The only information that matters is that which has been perceived, is being perceived and that which will be perceived. Around that string of sequenced knowledge we can weave a magic carpet of speculation that appears to fly from one vista to another. We might come to believe that without our carpet we are stranded, and then never learn that we can fly without it.
    We can only believe that the nature of  the world we hold in common exists independently from us. What is certain is that it binds us together, in that it enables us to share language. We can share our experiences and discover  that however it occurred that we came to be, our minds operate very much in a similar way and we can understand each other effectively and help each other, because we all want to experience integrity of self while sharing ourselves with others, we all want to experience the fullness of our own nature. 
    The belief that there is a universe out there like the one in our minds, a reality that persists in being governed by immutable laws like the reality in our minds, a substantial coherent consistent world  that exists whether or not we exist, is an assumption based on assumptions. An assumption such as the universe existed before our minds came to be and somehow caused our minds to come into being as a very partial and flawed reflection of it's comprehensive truth. We only perceive with our senses a very small fraction of the information there is out there to reprieve. The light we see with our eyes and that registers in our brains is an almost negligent fraction of the electromagnetic spectrum we calculate  is potentially infinite. The only reason the significance of the light we perceive as regards the nature of the universe isn't completely negligent, is that without it we couldn't make assumptions about all the light waves we can't see. The same could be said of sound. Or anything.
   Calculation and prediction became important particularly after man began to cultivate crops. Man then became acutely aware of the cycles of the seasons. His sense of time became more delineated. He began to measure time by observing the motions of the sun and the moon and the stars. He recognized recurrent  patterns and learned to predict seasons of rain. He observed the behavior of shadows and calculated the length of the day with units that represented the passage of time. He also saw other people with minds like his own,  be born and live and die, while the world continued to spin around him imperviously. It is very easy to understand why he would believe that man is transient and the universe is forever.
   Despite this, everything once believed about the nature of the world we exist in, has changed. For thousands of years it has been believed that matter can only be broken down into fundamental units that are of the same nature as their mass.  This was held true for a long time. For example, water could be boiled down to "atoms" of water which could no longer be divided. And so everything else. Recently it was discovered that much of nature is made of compounds that can be broken down into elements that are of a completely different nature than the compounds made from them. The qualities of the  compounds of elements held together in a uniform mass with the cohesive energy of the atoms of different elements are completely unpredictable. It is like this. 2A+1B  should somehow equal extrapolations of 2A1B, variations on a theme, so to speak. But they don't. 2A+1B equal completely unpredictable C.. There is nothing about the nature of C that can be inferred from As and Bs. Now when C is broken down, it always reverts to 2A+1B. This proves nothing but that man's experiences concerning elements and their combinations is logical and consistent even though he has no clue, "Why?"  that is so.
     In addition to this, it was further discovered that there are elements that can be broken down into other elements, that also have different qualities. The idea of a stable building block for all mass just keeps deteriorating like a radioactive isotope, but hasn't been abandoned even today, when it has been demonstrated  that the fundamental nature of mass is as much an infinite field of potentials as a particle we actually collide with. Not only that, the fundamental particles keep breaking up when we smash them together, producing a menagerie of circled and  patterned  motion, though we still have not a clue concerning what is really moving. It isn't and can't be  particles with mass as whatever it is, it doesn't behave the way mass should, according to the theories that are supposed to describe the true nature of mass and not just the way the mind thinks about mass. Science has come to the conclusion that the mass we perceive is actually an illusion of the mind. They draw their conclusions from the logic and math that describes the behavior of mass in their mind and then believe at the same time that the mass in the mind isn't really the same substance as keeps slipping between the ever growing holes in the sieves of their pet theories, the theories they try to catch particles of mass with, to find out what they really are.
   Laboratory experiments consistently demonstrate that the nature of any kind of fundamental particle  we wish to turn into information that we can think with and incorporate into a theorem of prediction is ever more elusive. Laboratory results demonstrate phenomena that exist outside the confines of logic and math, phenomena that completely demolish the idea that we  really know the nature of  the universe that exists within our own minds, let alone the nature of the universe that we presume exists out side our minds.  Scientists want fundamental particles that persist with a consistent definition no matter what you do to them. Without such particles, nothing can really make any sense. Wave functions are infinite and unpredictable. Energy alone can't explain why things behave like solid objects. The fact is, we can smash particles together and they collide and explode, even though that is a mathematical impossibility because nothing can really touch anything else mathematically. But logically things do touch and move each other. Suddenly the simplicity of the  logic of human experience trumps in its importance the theoretical consequences of experiential results that defy logic and experience. Scientists just can't let go of there being particles that exist in nature independently of our minds. Never the less, it becomes ever more evident that particles don't exist until someone sees them.
   Unlike the elusiveness of  the nature of substance itself, our minds are able to maintain the meaning of the symbols we think with and calculate with. This is so for no other reason than we decide it to be so. It is what works.
   In the same way, while our minds are mostly consistent in the way stimuli are perceived and translated into sensations, this is far from absolute. It is clearly evident  that a person can change in the way they interpret as a  sensory perception, a vibration that causes it. When a woman is touched by her husband intimately, she might moan with pleasure. If the same vibration causing motion were to be perpetrated by a stranger against her will, it might cause great emotional pain and distress. The significance of the sense causing vibration is determined by the context in which it is experienced. Just like the results of experiments in quantum mechanics.
    On the other hand, the mechanics of linguistic thought, perceptions in the nervous system, the brain's productions of sensations that represent hunger, thirst, sexual arousal, motion, emotions that represent states of well being or the lack thereof, all these  and more internal workings,  remain mostly consistent over time and are shared for the most part by all humanity. While we don't know why red is the sensation we experience when our eyes  are exposed to a certain wavelength of light, the relationship between the stimulus and the response of color in our eye is persistent over time, until the eye decays. There is commonality, consistence and persistence in the way our nervous system translates vibrations into sensory data. This is the foundation of language.
    In addition to this, sensory data is stored in our minds and used  as an ever greater,  more complex and sophisticated context, to evaluate new data. Our wisdom, if not our intelligence, grows as we age.
Logic and math  define much of the way we process and use information, but intuition and spontaneity determine ideas and decisions that are life enhancing and sometimes life saving, and very often it is impossible to explain logically or mathematically  how these qualities of mind come about.


What is certain is that A must continue to be A for things to make sense.


 Science reveals to us that the only place in the universe that A stays A long enough to use it in a calculation of the future, is in our mind, where it is certain that A exists. 

In the universe "out there", beyond the  relative commonality, persistence and consistence of our minds,

NOTHING STAYS THE SAME LONG ENOUGH TO BE COUNTED AND NOTHING CAN BE COUNTED ON.

Sunday, March 12, 2017

False Premises and Logic- How Scientists Go Wrong

False Premises and Logic- How Scientists Go Wrong

Some self evident and axiomatic truths are surprisingly ignored by scientists, physicists in particular. The most flagrant and fundamental of these truths is this. Whatever actually surrounds our mind, whatever is beyond our minds on a time space continuum, before, beyond or after, we can only speculate. What came before our minds began to record memories, what happens after our minds cease to record memories, can only be assumed, no matter how likely  we believe the assumption to be.

What exists beyond the registration of our perceptions can only be speculation. What is obvious is that whatever is going on in our minds, it appears to be only a partial reflection, a fraction, of what is actually going on outside our minds. All of research and science is an attempt to know what happened before we began to have memories as individuals- and historical records as a society, what is presently going on beyond our present perceptions of the space and time we assume surrounds us, and what will happen to ourselves and the selves of future generations. We have developed magnificent instruments that appear to extend our senses to the far reaches of the cosmos. We have developed the means to record the behavior of what we deem to be the infinitesimal building blocks of all the matter we perceive, we have mapped the ocean floors and dug out the ruins of ancient civilizations all over the planet.

    Our desire to know the nature of the universe we presume surrounds us extends beyond the practicalities of controlling it to ensure our own survival. Long before we developed the modern technologies of research we have today, philosophers used the tools innate to their own humanity to speculate about the nature of the universe of which we are a part. This overwhelming curiosity of the intellect to know what is really happening around one's self as well as in one's self, is sometimes stronger an instinct than procreation and the pleasures of the senses, for men have been know to leave far behind all kinds of pleasure seeking and worldly affluence and self propagation so as to clear their minds and contemplate the truth of what it means to exist at all, what influences our existence and how can we ourselves influence our own experience towards the attainment of wisdom and peace of mind.

Having said all this, what remains is the indisputable fact that we know nothing for certain except our own assumptions. 


   Yes, I allow myself to say that I know for certain that I am seeing the color red, or listening to music, or feeling hunger or sad. I know the tenderness of holding a baby and I choose to believe with the same certainty that there is really a baby out there beyond my own skin, a baby with a mind that works very similarly to mine. These are the things I know, what my senses perceive without interpretation or assumption. I do recognize though, that I know these things because they exist in my mind and my mind is so constructed as to contain a dynamic and partial reflection of what surrounds my physical being.

       The fundamental truth ever remains that I truly only know the contents of my own mind and my mind is so constructed that I accept the reality of what I perceive around me as being there as much as I am. I also accept as fundamental knowledge that there is far more out there than I perceive with my senses. Curiosity is a primal instinct and it comes along with the primal knowing that there is more out there than meets the eyes, or can be heard or smelled or tasted or felt with the skin. The seeking after new sensations is what feeds our minds with new information about the world around us and is the process of learning itself.

      In the absence of pathology, the mind constructs itself with mathematical precision and is characterized for the most part, by an ever growing collection of coherent ideas. These ideas serve a tools in the acquirement of more ideas. The ideas one constructs about reading allow one to read new ideas. When we acquire a new idea, it comes together in our own mind as a duplication of an idea we might assume exists external to our own mind. It is as if there is knowledge out there which we assimilate in the process of learning. If what we experience in our own mind is an imperfect duplication of the idea "out there", we are unable to use it as a tool in the acquirement of more new ideas. Until our own mind duplicates exactly the knowledge deemed to be held in common, it is unlikely that we will be able to add to it, let alone make use of it for our own interests. We are all ignorant to some degree and helpless in some field of endeavor.

       One thing remains true, the laws of logic and language that dictate the construction of ideas, the rules of mathematics, determine to what degree ideas can be passed from one mind to another, because the laws of logic and mathematics are common to all minds. When there is a failure of logic in an idea, when an idea is incoherent, it is rejected by those who see in it faulty reasoning. Logic is as innate to the mind as the senses are to the body. It is logic that strings the perceptions of the body into strings of significance and weaves them together as experience, and then stores the experiences in the mind as memory.

      Logic allows us to extrapolate that when three dots appear in a sequence at the same intervals, it is logical to assume if a fourth dot appears, it will most likely do so at the same interval and the same angle of progression. This is fine as long as we don't insist on it's being true before it happens. When it does appear as we predict, we can be even more certain of the fifth dot doing the same. But when the sixth dot appears sooner than we expect and at a divergent angle, we must recognize our assumption about the pattern of the emerging dots is wrong.There was a fault in our logic and that fault is, one can never know the final nature of a pattern until it repeats itself and when it repeats itself as an exact duplicate, we can call it a pattern. How significant the pattern is can only be determined by the duration of its recurrence, its resonance with other patterns and its relevance to communication.

It is the enhancement of communication that determines the ultimate value of all pattern recognition.

     And so our minds share the same innate rules concerning their growth and resonance with other minds. Minds are constantly coming and going. Some resonate with many and some resonate with few. The less a mind is assumed to be logical and coherent in the fields of its endeavors, the less it will resonate with those in contact with it. Now it is completely possible and self evident that minds that congregate and communicate together as a group in what appears to the members of the group to be perfectly logical and coherent ideas, can be deemed by other groups to be illogical and incoherent. Groups don't always resonate with each other, and that is a significant understatement.

      Groups in which the members do resonate, through communication, become more homogeneous to the degree their communications with outsiders becomes limited. Differences dissipate and similarities spread. Cohesion strengthens and bonds are reinforced. This is particularly true for groups fighting for survival against outsiders who are trying to rid the world of such illogical, incoherent, and what is deemed to be of such- mentally pathological symptoms as those displayed by a group whose ideas are deemed illogical and unfounded on truthful experience and logical extrapolation from those experiences.

The Jews are a study for research of these phenomena.

    Their history and the development of their culture is founded on experiences that defy logic, on miracles. All of Judaism is based on the essential and fundamental premise that there were in the past, before our own memories came to be, men and women who were created by an intelligent deity that also created the universe that surrounds us all. The Jews believe that the world with the heavens around it was created by One God and that same God created man and endowed him with both logic and free choice. They believe that so started a narrative that continues till this day. They believe that it has been their duty to preserve that narrative as their highest calling, the reason for their existence. They believe that narrative to be a direct and faithful replication of what was communicated to their prophet Moses, by their Creator Deity.

    They have always admitted that they don't understand as a nation the full significance and implications of this sacred narrative and The Divine Laws they believe it contains. Their faith in the Divine value and ultimate historical importance of this narrative has weathered the trials and tribulations of 3500 years of its being challenged, in every torturous, sadistic, murderous, abusive, degrading, insulting way imaginable for individual Jews as an example before the nation and for vast amounts of members of the nation itself, Jews horrifically put to death, men, women and children across the ages.

      Yet with varying degrees of homogeneity, themselves split into sub groups with deep divisions between them selves in their interpretative doctrines of the Narratives significance, they are still here declaring an invisible God really spoke to their ancestors and told them something of absolute and extreme importance to humanity. Only problem is, they don't really know themselves any more how true the stories are, how to finally interpret them.

      The most orthodox of the Jews are the most homogeneous in outward appearances. They wear clothes that set them apart from the rest of humanity, clothes that are uniform and for the men and boys, lack any individual self expression. The most extreme of the orthodox believe that their only function in the world, is to learn how Moses's narrative as he recorded it from God, was interpreted by those who came after him. They readily profess that no one today can really comprehend the mysteries of Moses's revelation on Mount Sinai, they say its impossible to know the final truth of what Moses meant the Jews to do, other than wait for their Messiah to come, who will explain what it all means to them and the world. The most extreme of the Orthodox believe that nothing at all should be done by Jews except keep the Laws they believe in and study aforementioned interpretations. They deny the legitimacy of Zionism and ostracize any one who they believe tries to water down their fanatic adherence to practices that produce nothing of exchange value with the world around them. They believe themselves to be entitled to financial support from any source it comes from, including the Israeli government they deny the legitimacy of, though there is a minority among them that refuses government money and lives completely in poverty off charities.

     This hard core nucleus of self declared fatalist fanaticism grows exponentially because they marry very young in arranged marriages and have as many children as nature allows over the course of the woman's childbearing age. Around this fanatic nucleus of unwavering blind belief in events they have no personal memories of, these Jews are surrounded by a layer of similarly dressed ultra orthodox believers who are somewhat more open minded in their approach to the modern world. They see Israel as a means to the end of their financial support and would use The State of Israel in any way possible to further their own interests of expanding their influence over the nation as a whole. They are far more proactive and participate in politics as government Ministers. They are not Zionists but they are in active participation with Zionists in affairs of common interest to Jews as a nation. Like the most fanatic orthodox they don't interpret the rise of Israel after the holocaust as the realization of prophecies in The Hebrew Bible outwardly, but privately many of them seem to like the idea and even express a desire to see Israel flourish and prosper as the mostly secular state it is. And then there are the ultra religious Zionists who are few, and the less fanatic religious Jews who believe that the state of Israel is a sign of Israel's redemption and they are supposed to settle the lands God promised to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the narrative written by Moses and even rebuild the Temple on The Temple Mount in Jerusalem. In the story these Jews tell themselves, they aren't supposed to wait for the messiah who probably isn't really coming anyway because things like that no loner happen and God helps those who help themselves. These Jews, while religious, are very rational and don't really believe in miracles where God breaks the laws of nature he created the world with. Many of them are scientists and doctors and lawyers and Zionists. And then there are the traditional Jews who believe the Jews are special as a people because they are after all an historical anomaly and the creation of Israel after the holocaust seems like something the God of The Jews would do, perhaps....they aren't too sure about the truth of the Bible stories but they are proud to be Jews and Israelis and unique among the nations.

     There are many non believing Jews who are simply patriotic Zionists, they don't believe in the Narrative of Moses and believe the Hebrew Bible to be a work of national myths, they might take pride in it as a contribution to western civilization but they find it boring and difficult to read themselves. Satire programs on television in Israel openly ridicule and scorn the Bible stories and those who believe in them. These shows are applauded by the many secular Jews in Israel who don't believe in God or destiny at all. They believe in science and the survival of the fittest and see themselves as being very fit by reason of their survival as secular .Jews. I have by no means exhausted the different kinds of groups among Jews and in Judaism.

       What I believe holds them all together despite their vast differences in faith, beliefs and narratives, is that they all share a belief that the Jews are unique as as a people and a historical phenomenon, albeit for different reasons, and this idea that they all belong to a unique nation is such a harmonizing idea in their minds. gives them so much significance and self value, that the resonance of this idea between them is of far greater power to cause them to coalesce than the repulsive energy of their mutual accusations that the other parties are irrational and lack integrity of mind.

That is what logic produces, integrity of mind.

     No matter how unfounded are one's initial premises, no matter how anti intuitive or against common sense are the propositions upon which one builds a paradigm of beliefs and ideas one adheres to, if there is internal logic- then doctrines and dogma will be adhered to, to the degree doing so maintains and enhances one's existing social relationships.

     If I accept the belief that Jesus is the Son of God and He came and gave his life so as to free me from sin, well then I am freed and will experience the logical emotional consequence which is a great feeling of relief at my release from the burden of guilt and the consequences of my sins. It makes perfect sense that once I choose to believe in the foundation premise other people believe in and then experience the same emotional consequence of such a belief, we will resonate with each other and become a group that attracts any one else seeking such release and relief. In order to feel a release from pain or to prevent the pain of disillusion and the loss of social integration with a group with which one no longer shares beliefs, or have a chance of happiness, people will believe the most outrageous things imaginable.

        Those who credit themselves as being too objective and intelligent and scientific and rational and don't consider themselves capable of adhering to outlandish beliefs that have no logical foundation adhere to that very same belief despite glaring evidence that their theories and formulas and equations simply don't make sense in light of recent evidence gleaned in laboratories and from instrumental registrations of what is going on in deep space.

    The observations of the workings of the mind are the principles of logic and logic describes how the mind works, not the universe.


     For a long time, logic and math seemed to describe very efficiently that part of the universe which is reflected in our own minds. So much so that philosophers and scientists assumed that the workings of the mind and the universe are the same. Therefor it seemed to make sense that man's mind is potentially capable of understanding completely the workings of the universe. At the same time many scientists believed and believe today, that the universe exists in complete independence of the mind that perceives it and operates on the mind's logic without the mind being involved or party to the external reality that gave birth to the mind, because that independent external reality existed and came together countless eons before the mind did.

       Despite all the implicit fine tuned order in the universe it still doesn't obey the theorems of modern science in a way that makes consistent coherent sense. Every time they think they have figured out a formula to predict the recurrence of a pattern they have observed on one scale of matter, matter behaves differently, anyway. Despite their use of the intelligence of their own minds to figure out the universe that they believe gives birth to their minds, they won't concede that the universe's intelligence is greater than their own and might not be subject to the same logic and math that governs human minds.

      The thinking of secular scientists, of atheists who believe in science but not an intelligent universe, of those who believe that chaos gives birth to reason that can then encompass and comprehend the inconceivable chaos of a purposeless and innately meaningless universe, the thinking of these people is founded on irrational premises, the first being that logic and mathematics describes anything but the working of the human mind and how it processes information about whatever there is around it. Whatever it is that surrounds the human mind outside it, can't be known as it never makes full entrance into the mind without shedding it's substance and assuming symbols of sensation that can only superficially represent what is really going on out there.

        The color red represents a reality of a postulated wavelength "out there" like the word tree represents a reality out there. No matter what one does with the letters of the word tree, one knows nothing at all of the true nature of a tree outside one's mind. We only know the tree that enters our mind as a collection of symbolic perceptions and then we can stick the word tree on that package of perceptions and then only assume that that has anything to do with what is going on out there. No one has a clue what the wavelength of the color red is really like out there, as a reality that can be perceived as itself. The color red is neither particles or waves. It is a sensation that acts as a symbol for what we presume is a character of electromagnetic waves that don't exist as such in our minds, but represents these waves we presume exist outside our minds and even in our brains. Red doesn't exist in any way we can imagine it as such, except as a property of the mind we share with others as we share the mechanism of logic that hold our minds together.

_________________
A Catastrophic Tragedy. Maybe Not!

29283812363938/11=2662164760358

Jonathan Michael Robbins

= 939=

יונתן מיכאל רבינס